Box 2-HairLossProd
Container
Contains 13 Results:
Legal Case Summaries
File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 11
Scope and Contents
From the Series:
Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates:
1887-2001
Nutriol Correspondence, July-December 1986
File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 12
Scope and Contents
From the Series:
Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates:
July-December 1986
FDA Correspondence on Skin Treatment Products
File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 13
Scope and Contents
From the Series:
Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates:
1887-2001